In my 22 hours I've only. In the late game I just go with energy weapons (mostly focused arc emitters and neutron launchers) and strike craft. AI because they never spec Point Defense. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. It also has higher DPS before shields and armor come into play, and those affect smaller ships less than big ships. SITUATIONAL SHIP TYPES Battleship Lightning - Full Arc Emitter and Cloud Lightning - Mostly used for beating Fallen Empires. Stellaris' combat system is garbage. Unlocking each requires you to have the proper level of strike craft technology and a matching. Unlocks Teldar Plant, Teldar Ammunition Factory, Teldar Crystals. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Part of the chemical energy is converted to the kinetic energy of the car, while part is converted to thermal energy as heat emitted from the. Kinetic pair and Energy pair (G vs A; P vs L). 6 Technology List – Q to S. Now yes, it's Stellaris and we can just say "new meta - XL battleships with Carrier core and line computer ftw" and yes you can even design an artillery battleship that isn't awful (as long as you don't mix kinetic weapons with plasma due to the range differences) but when the best way to use a titan (which can't have a line computer). I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. I mean if you look at the missiles you know you can shoot them down whit point defense, energy. This command adds the specified amount of energy credits to your energy credits amount. AI because they never spec Point Defense. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Penetration doesn't "cover all bases" in a multiplayer context - penetrating weapons are countered by hardening components, which can be added to most builds at little opportunity cost. Flak does less damage per shot, in contrast, but is. Like now missiles really suck so barely anybody uses them. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. 16 comments. PD starts with 10 Tracking and ends with 30. Because i tink that the kinetic wepons right now give an advantage in combat. Ditch the Tachyon lance unless you're going up against Prethoryn. Ship designs will auto-upgrade if you check the box on the lower right of the screen, with an exception for Jump Drives / Psi Jump Drives. . Destroyers are ideal for a few decades before battleships become common, but. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. In my 22 hours I've only. Title Card Overlay by Wi. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. The differentiation is supposed to be that energy PD is better against missiles while kinetic PD is better against strikecraft. Ceramo Metal Materials. Battleships are very vulnerable to torpedoes now, and all spinal mount and artillery weapons got nerfed pretty hard so their damage output isn't quite as overwhelming compared with other ship-types anymore. Shields- 1. Titans are commonly artillery ships, so they have an energy+kinetic combo that works well with artillery battleships, but artillery ships suffer from minimal range and get rekt by torpedos. Best. The only time I took on a xenophobe awakened (before utopia) was with a combined fleet including: my fleet, the federation fleet,my allies and my vassals which amounted to roughly 620k against their 780k fleet. In same time energy weapon became only stronger in time - lasers are very mediocre, plasma is strongest anti-armor gun (and we need it to deal with AE and Leviathans) and tachyons are simply best X-sized weapon in game. The rest of the slots aren't that critical, but you can put whirlwind missiles in any medium slots and small. Vice versa for armor - still 200 per volley, and against hull you do 225 damage per volley, which is better than the blank weapons. Legacy Wikis. Lasers: a good early-game weapon before you get to the Proton Launcher, but goes obsolete once you reach that tech level. Money (or in the case of Stellaris, Energy) is the blood flowing through the veins of your galactic empire. you can dump your excess trade into CG/Unity, whereas generators don't rely on your trade protection. Titans are commonly artillery ships, so they have an energy+kinetic combo that works well with artillery battleships, but artillery ships suffer from minimal range and get rekt by torpedos. Since the ship tipe have been change i always had this idea in my mind, that the kinetic weapons should have a malus damage on armor like energy weapons have it on shield. Giga cannon has substantially higher base damage per hit, which, despite the fact that tachyon lance has a little more bonus vs hull, still allows for good chance at doing killing shots. Kinetic Artillery would be the best L-slot weapon, except I'm not going to bother with a bunch of kinetic repeatables that *only* benefit Titans and nobody else. Graey • 7 yr. These were originally planned as energy only but during play we found out that with a few more perks they make awesome armies as well! This is the only species that really “needs” to be psionic and cybernetic. So if you have Blue Lasers (tier 2 energy weapons) you’re probably better off with those (and hopefully a kinetic railgun to help with shields) than you would be with nuclear missiles (tier 1 explosive weapons). Core Cracking. Then design two types defence platforms. This article is mainly aimed at newcomers, or at least past players returning after a long break, but hopefully even veteran players will be able to. 16 comments. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. plasma meanwhile has 5% of the effectiveness of. I'd have hoped Power Projection would've been based off your fleet power Vs the fleet power of your rivals. Hangars are themselves a penetrating weapon, and shield hardeners are your best shot at keeping your small ships alive against them. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. A lot of armor, go energy. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Quick reference: Defenses are good against what they are: physical defense vs physical weapons, energy defense vs energy weapons. ago. 99. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Signature Weapons [3. Darsol • 7 yr. Energy is good at baseline, and gets better automatically through tech progress. Flak does less damage per shot, in contrast, but is. The tachyon has 90% armor pen, and -33% shield damage. So in my opinion the giga canon is really the way to go. The Contingency use energy weapons that are ineffective against shields. ago • Edited 4 yr. 68,5 average) so enemies have a higher chance to disengange. 5 inf. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. they have a higher bonus vs. . I currently struggle to balance damage types, fleet speed and fleet ranges. And if they have, armor is better than hull against kinetic batteries. . Stellaris Wiki Active Wikis. Destroyers- if you use them, should be built for alpha and to die. It’ll also make your Kinetic and Explosive weapons more powerful, which is paramount for protecting your trade routes and territory from pirates or enemy empires. 13. Designations tell what kind of weapons and defense were deployed. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. They make up for it by totally bypassing shields on top of their extremely high DPS and decent armour penetration. 9] With this mod there are seven basic types of strike craft (and three level of advancement per type), corresponding to the five types of basic kinetic and energy weapons and the two types of point-defense. ago. Fleet Power: The Neutron Battleships had a fleet power of 86. IMHO the much better way is to stick with explosive + strike craft. Shields- 1. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Titans. I haven't played in almost a year. There is some retargeting in stellaris so anti shield weapons prefer to fire at shielded enemies and its usually important to have at least some anti shield damage. Kinetic pair and Energy pair (G vs A; P vs L). I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. 1. And if you're looking for the trope taken to its logical extreme, there's Ramming Always Works and the Colony Drop . 25), or Energy and Consumer Goods (1= 0. Graey • 7 yr. With the recent update to 1. Energy weapons are better at defeating shields and or armor, but they have lower overall DPS for the most part than kinetic weapons (not talking about tachyon. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. I haven't played in almost a year. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. In my 22 hours I've only. 6+) For those unaware, the "~" command will bring up the console. The Low roll damage for a Lance is an Average roll for. The enigmatic decoders are really good on this ship as well. This isn't the first time it this has happened. And if they have, armor is better than hull against kinetic batteries. ago. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. hull and a bonus vs. Agreed although the highest tier ones are rather meaty but still weaker than their energy counterparts. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Kuzu90. Against d2 it will take about 0. The first choice you make in the for weapons in the game are the ones your starting with, And this decision should determine your play style to a higher degree then any other factor. For standard battles, it’s tough to beat the reliability and versatility of the simple plasma accelerator, complete with high damage and low energy cost. Physics research. Once you get like 4 of each in a fleet, barely anything beats it. Accuracy is the standard/max to-hit of a weapon. Applying a force requires us to do work. Ships: Shields vs Armor. This page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 10:53. Both have the same Accuracy. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Incorporating secondary weapons such as lasers or autocannons can. Both! Kinetic weapons have a bonus against Shields and malus against Armor, while Laser ones have the opposite. Late-game, weapons that ignore shields and armor are great, but early on they aren't as important. Finally kinetic stacking will work in enough numbers to strip those big shield numbers, but this will take time that their fleets are pounding yours. For an overall practical design I fit Corvettes with one Energy mount and two kinetics. Kauldric Jul 30, 2022 @ 12:58pm. Hull- 9. Our fleets were "Equivalent". . As it stands now, kinetic vs energy is a joke. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Right out the gate mass drivers are better then red lasers. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Sending in a Demolitions Team using an Army. I think my favorite early ship build is a Corvette with Point Defense, Energy Siphon, and Lasers. AI because they never spec Point Defense. My fleet got obliterated and theirs barely took any damage, despite my ship designs hard countering theirs. So stack shields and dont neglect strike craft (best) and flak (not. In the early game? I just messed up my Inward Perfection Ironman game because I upgraded my missile fleet to Autocannons. Earthbound (+15% Energy, +20% Army Damage) Thrifty (+15% Energy)My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Conversely, they aren’t very good against enemy armor. Makes them able to get through both armour and shields. It is much easier to get the best kinetic than energy. 24 , 24. In my 22 hours I've only. Fixes to mass missiles being bad. So, PD can negate T2 Missiles, but T5 Missiles are left with 10 Evasion. overall, the energy torpedoes are the better weapon in my opinion. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. Because Trade is an inefficient resource, unless you pick up bonuses that make it better, and those bonuses require you to pick specific Species Traits, Traditions, etc. Hangars are themselves a penetrating weapon, and shield hardeners are your best shot at keeping your small ships alive against them. Place the shield debuff defence platform right next to your spaceports, and then place the snare one right outside the red bubble. Oh, and also because that's where my mind goes as a reader of the Honor Harrington series. [deleted] • 5 yr. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. But torpedos and kinetics is the real answer. Energy vs Scourge, Kinetic vs Unbidden, disrupters (corvette swarm is my preferred tactic) vs Contingency, torp or disrupter corvettes vs Gray Tempest, etc. Point Defense does more damage per shot - its better at actually destroying incoming attackers because it kills them in less hits, giving them less of an opportunity to damage your fleet - if it hits, which is the critical distinction. However at the start the difference is miniscule. For every other component, just use the best available. But how about the. Don't listen to that troll, the best early game design is always 2 red lasers and a mass driver (because kinetic weapons are only needed to take down shields otherwise they are always inferior to energy weapons), use improved components as they are researched and go shield heavy as you can afford it because winning wars is all about. If you've researched their respective technologies and all your slots are occupied, just click 'auto complete ship' and it will fill in the slots with the latest technologies. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. In Stellaris, the economy is based on the production and consumption of resources and services either from a specific planet or throughout the empire. This is something I've been observing more and more as I play. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. I've developed a system of ship designators to assist in fleet design and upgrade. We could pretend that they use some kind of crazy magnetic-containment sabot, driven by steam produced by the reactor. Energy weapons are good against armor but weak against shields. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Early game there are distinct performance differences between kinetics, energy and missile weapons leading to doctrines raised around employing weaponry of different sizes and ranges. Energy Siphon isn't a bad weapon for the time you get it; its a fine one. Contrast We Will Use Lasers in the Future, where energy weapons are more prevalent than kinetic weapons. The Kinetic Weapons variants include mega cannon, mass driver, autocannon, and kinetic launcher. Early game there are distinct performance differences between kinetics, energy and missile weapons leading to doctrines raised around employing weaponry of different sizes and ranges. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Elcuern0 • 3 yr. If you're fighting other empires, I go with a mix of artillery battleships (pick your poison, energy or kinetic) and carrier battleships (because high evasion corvettes suck). I have the weird feelings that if I had pursued missile research instead of switching to kinetics, I would have easily won that war. I haven't played in almost a year. All it does is make the first technology in every line of weapons into a rare technology, but upgrades to that. Energy weapons also have a "special" kinds of weapons (Disruptors and Arc Emitters) that ignore both shields and armor, all damage goes directly to the hull but the overall damage can be pretty low. Because i tink that the kinetic wepons right now give an advantage in combat. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. that is a 325% difference in base DPS before adjusting for modifiers. Large broadside battleship. Flak on the other hand starts at 50 Tracking and ends at 70. So first why not change the hole slot system to be more like…Small tweaks to range/dps/energy to dps ratios for flavor. None of these have anything to do with the kinetic tech tree so its not at all uncommon for me to be in like battleship/titan tech levels with only T1 mass drivers as my kinetic weapon :) Physics only have like power, energy buildings, sensors, combat computers and shields as high prio techs and you can put off both shields and energy. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. Disruptors and other piercing weapons, since the Contingency has strong shields and armor but poor hull. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Disruptors have 10 less range (50 vs. This energy can be released in a car engine when the gasoline combusts, producing high-temperature gases that move the engine’s pistons and, ultimately, propel the car forward (kinetic energy) 1 . (2) attacker with long range kinetic (1) hunter with long range kinetic. If you want more Stellaris guides, you can also Check: Console Commands & Cheats. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. Because i tink that the kinetic wepons right now give an advantage in combat. Energy is good at baseline, and gets better automatically through tech progress. Kinetic energy is not a vector. But how about the. Small plasma cannon- 6. 75CG. Late-game, weapons that ignore shields and armor are great, but early on they aren't as important. I used arc emitters, energy and plasma weapons with enough fighter and flak support to counter their fighter/bombers. Autocannons are still solid good on Corvs to fight other Corvs. Kinetic Weapons. Stellaris. The area provides access to several key points, including: additional research capabilities, strategic resources reveal, point-defense & energy weapons, improved FTL capabilities, improved energy production & storage, and more. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. In my 22 hours I've only. an explosive vs. Edit: apparently not I don't think it's a great advantage, but I guess if you want to sacrifice a bit of destructive power for more defensibility, it's goodI haven't played in almost a year. have rather significant amounts of PD, making missile based weaponry significantly less effective. AI because they never spec Point Defense. 16 DPS. The fleet power remaining was an average of 43,980 and the average number of ships remaining was 17. I once started an. A fleet full of Battleships, equipped with Giga Cannons and loaded to the gills with Kinetic Artillery, with as many high-tier shields as you can put on them, with Artillery computers and - if you. Autocannon vs Railgun is more up for debate for S and M. For an overall practical design I fit Corvettes with one Energy mount and two kinetics. even on the autocannon's worst target it has 40% the effectiveness of plasma. It doesn't make sense to me. Kinetics supposedly chew through shields faster than most (thats supposed to be their strength) but theres disruptors for that. In addition, when the Galactic. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile viewKinetic energy must always be either zero or a positive value. Global Energy Management, Automated Exploration Protocols, Specialized. • 4 yr. AI because they never spec Point Defense. At 90% evasion 60% tracking, there’s a 45% chance to hit with small weapons. The Unbidden have heavily shielded ships, and their weapons all suck vs shields. This page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 10:53. The mega cannon is good against everything, since weapon systems can target individually that means most of the damage bonuses are wasted and that there are no obvious weapons to synergize with. In my 22 hours I've only. Gotcha, that makes sense. Energy had your basic lasers, apocalyptic tachyons, and a plethora of variants in between for anti shield duty, anti armor duty, weird electric clouds and anything else you can think of. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. The other with a shield debuff aura, your best armor, and your best medium guns. 5. Say I want to have a titan assigned to every fleet. The kinetic energy KE equation is as follows: KE = 0. Kinetics do have on average slightly higher dps, so technically they chew through shields a bit quicker but not cause either. You starting weapons should make up the backbone of your fleet throughout the entire game. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. BusterHighmann. If you have 5-6 fleets of those battleships and titans you can kill an unbidden fleet and the anchor with no losses. Laser is fine as starting weapon, but it makes it a little harder to get the good kinetic stuff fast. There are a few things to do. Here are our Stellaris tips to help you out. 67. I have not had good results with explosive weapons so far. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by…I haven't played in almost a year. This is a bit of a problem given the way the tech curve works in the current balance, since plasma is only relevant for maybe a few decades, so there's little point in even teching into it at all. Plasma throwers are good for that, but those are usually mid-game cruiser+ weapons. But that is only even taking into account the enemy damage types. Stellaris Wiki Active Wikis. They are meant to inflict heavy damage against enemy shields. Missiles have few strengths and many weaknesses. This lets me focus my tech research on the types of weapons I'm actually using. It's totally backwards to me. gamefaqs_astrophys. Even against level 1 and two starports mass drivers are slightly better, but it is a much narrower gap. Missiles are good before everyone has shields; torpedos are best when everyone has shields, but before they all have point defense. 2 Kinetic Artillery is 80 average damage per day vs the Saturator's 115, while the Saturator has a higher multiplier against both shields and armor. Later on, fancy long range weapons start to appear and by the advent of kinetic batteries and heavy launchers there is little to no reason to use the L. When you hover over PD weapons, under "Type" they say "Point Defense, Kinetic". Lets break down the weapon and defence components available in Stellaris. Definitely. AI because they never spec Point Defense. The focused arc emitter does 11. I like energy weapons because of the lightshow. 5K subscribers Join Subscribe 2. One for armor, and one for shields (2 pairs). Armor is good against Kinetic weapons. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. 6 combat rebalance update. Energy weapons offer a marginal improvement over kinetic weapons, a boost of only 10-15 percent. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. Directly opposite :) Energy weapon are main and kinetic only situational early-game + anti-shield role (kinetic artillery & Flaks). All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. In my 22 hours I've only. Oct 15, 2017 @ 2:14am AC vs MD nothing changed, really: ACs are better early game, when ships are small, shields are not as. (Low dmg vs Shields, High dmg vs Armors, Superior dmg vs Hull. I use plasma on my corvette swarms. AI because they never spec Point Defense. While velocity can have a positive or negative value, velocity squared is always positive. If tachyon works great vs scourge I can assume giga and kinetic will work great vs another crisis. It's even worse if multiple missiles are aiming for the same target. . I've noticed that in base Stellaris minerals never run out through construction of extra mining stations while energy credits never stop being an issue. 1 (played yesterday) funnily enough i had much better results with full on kinetic than arc emitters and empty, arc amitters and lightning and arc emitters and pd+hangar, despite heavily researching energy weapon repeatables and no kinetic ones, than with focused arc emitters. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. It is easier for weapons to ignore, but also easier to bulk up. AI because they never spec Point Defense. I would use Kinetic normal stuff until I can build Kinetic Artillery and that is the bread & butter of the fleet. Large broadside battleship. 2 kinetic, 1 laser, 2 shield, 1 armour corvette. In my 22 hours I've only. AI because they never spec Point Defense. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. 10% for the outcome, plus the luck to even find that anomaly, and the very slim chances to get it that early. Looking for a complete list of working cheats for Stellaris game? Our site contains all the existing codes and various tricks. I haven't played in almost a year. Hull- 9. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. The icon makes them look like artillery, but I take them to be a scaled-up multi-projectile railgun. ) - 155mm Shock Cannon -. I mean if you look at the missiles you know you can shoot them down whit point defense, energy. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. I've been playing around with trade value and ecumenopolis a bit and I realize that producing energy via trade is much more convenient than doing it throught normal means: a generator district produces 8 base energy and employs 2 pops, while a basic commercial zone produces 10 trade value, 10 amenities and employs 5 people. Still need a minimum amount of Energy regardless, for the Hull damage. Use arc emitters and kinetic battery. Battleships are given a Giga Cannon and Proton Torpedoes, which are kinetic and energy mounts respectively. I stick to only energy and kinetic weapons, and don't even touch strike craft or missiles. The first option is to use a Science Ship to study the Devourer's corpse, which will give players the chance to either harvest it for 10,000 Energy Credits, 2,000 Minerals, and 80 of Stellaris. the Kinetic X slot weapons have a cooldown of 11 days while the other Energy X weapons have a cooldown like 0. By the time I research energy siphons there are far better weapons available to strip shields away, and the damage is very low. Likewise, in energy, because its so tiny, I'll always get a shield option pop up. If you do have enough or think you do you ~can smack them hard with Torpedo corvette spam and always have your own PD. However, I wanted to. Kinetic weapons are good because they keep shooting down regenerating shields so that the energy weapons can keep destroying the armor it is good against so both can ultimately attack the hull they are decent against, so for kinetics to be good you need weapons that have a bonus against armor and or hull to use the shields getting shot down. In Stellaris, one can benefit from this for quicker achievement of the following:. E. Secondly, Starbases are way more cost effective than fleets in the early game. Thoughts on 3. I haven't played in almost a year. Penetration doesn't "cover all bases" in a multiplayer context - penetrating weapons are countered by hardening components, which can be added to most builds at little opportunity cost. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Armor is good against Kinetic weapons. Personally I get Missile Cruisers with Torpedo Corvettes and a line of anti-missile PP and Flak Destroyers from early-mid game. For every other component, just use the best available. If we want to accelerate an object, then we must apply a force. Two autocannons and one plasma. 401K subscribers in the Stellaris community. First thing to mention IMO is that the breakeven point for conventional vs bypass, if you assume even energy/kinetic repeatables (though not actually the case in practice as we both know since engineering always lags behind), is actually (mostly) about the target’s defensive repeatables, not your own weapons repeatables. AI because they never spec Point Defense. PD starts with 10 Tracking and ends with 30. tech_kinetic_artillery_1: Kinetic Battery: tech_kinetic_artillery_2: Kinetic Artillery. Engineering has many strategic resources. #7. In my experience using missiles or torpedoes early game is a non starter as the auto-best designs favour copious amounts of point defence. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. But fielding energy, kinetic and explosive weapons mean double research for repeatables in engineering. The focused arc has 100% armor pen and 100% shield pen. In Stellaris, Kinetic weapons are made to take out enemy shields. 3 Stellaris Tech Id List – C to E. As the title says. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Subscribe to download. Carrier battleship. 00. Kinetic Battleship Analysis: N/A. ago. It lacks the bonus to hull damage lasers have. You mix in picket corvette or 2 depending on your OCD levels for jump speed bonus and couple Carrier Battleships with strike craft to screen enemy corvettes boom done. this version is for reworked tactical system. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Members Online • [deleted]. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. 1 giga cannon, 2 artillery, the rest some kind of laser. In my 22 hours I've only. 9 Meta Update] We are all aware that Stellaris ship design has had a massive rebalance, and with that the combat system and the overall pace of the game. View this video if you want to lea. In the early game? I just messed up my Inward Perfection Ironman game because I upgraded my missile fleet to Autocannons. Stellaris: Every Weapon Ranked - In this video I review every weapon and rank them in the new 3. Which basically means you need kinetic weapons. Costs 600 Engineering, Requires Nanocomposite. After work has been done, energy has been transferred to the object, and the object will be moving with a new constant speed. 1. I built my fleet to counter the enemy's (they had only missiles) by giving my ships Point Defense and Kinetic weapons to counter their shields. I find success with the 3 S slots layout slotted with 1 energy and 2 kinetic mounts.